Case study
Eneco Cut Regression Testing from 16hrs to <1hr
What used to take 4 teams a full 16+ hours of testing now takes under an hour with Maestro.
Read the full studyvs
Maestro vs Appium: the benchmark
Stop fighting flakiness. Switch to the framework that runs faster, reads cleaner, and keeps mobile UI tests maintainable as your suite grows.
Benchmark
The practical differences show up in every run
Appium can be extended endlessly. Maestro is designed to keep the common path simple: readable flows, fewer waits, faster feedback, and debugging tools that fit mobile testing.
Maestro
Appium
Setup
Maestro
Near-zero setup; install the CLI and start writing tests.
Appium
Heavy setup with drivers, SDKs, language bindings, and environment configuration.
Syntax
Maestro
Declarative YAML that anyone on your team can read.
Appium
Imperative code tied to programming languages and test frameworks.
Audience
Maestro
Manual testers, QA, SDETs, engineers, PMs, and product owners.
Appium
Primarily software engineers and SDETs.
Built-in waits
Maestro
Automatic and implicit, aligned with UI state.
Appium
Explicit waits are required and easy to misuse.
Flakiness handling
Maestro
Built-in retries and stability heuristics by default.
Appium
Must be designed, coded, and maintained manually.
Cross-platform coverage
Maestro
One concise syntax for Android, iOS, and Web.
Appium
Multi-platform, but with divergent patterns and configs.
Device support
Maestro
Android, iOS, and web execution locally or in Maestro Cloud.
Appium
Broad device support with significant setup overhead.
Authoring speed
Maestro
Tests read like user intent and stay small.
Appium
Boilerplate-heavy and easy to over-engineer.
Maintenance cost
Maestro
Low due to declarative flows and fewer moving parts.
Appium
High as suites grow and abstractions pile up.
Extensibility
Maestro
YAML-first with optional JavaScript for edge cases.
Appium
Unlimited, at the cost of complexity.
Performance
Maestro
Lightweight runtime with fast startup and execution.
Appium
Heavier architecture and slower feedback loops.
Debugging experience
Maestro
Maestro Studio provides live inspection and replay.
Appium
Debugging via logs, IDEs, and patience.
Script comparison
The old way vs the easy way
The same flows take far less setup, waiting, and selector ceremony in Maestro.
Appium
import io.appium.java_client.AppiumBy;
import io.appium.java_client.android.AndroidDriver;
import io.appium.java_client.android.options.UiAutomator2Options;
import org.openqa.selenium.WebElement;
import org.openqa.selenium.support.ui.ExpectedConditions;
import org.openqa.selenium.support.ui.WebDriverWait;
import java.net.URL;
import java.time.Duration;
public class AppiumTest {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
UiAutomator2Options options = new UiAutomator2Options();
options.setDeviceName("Android Emulator");
options.setAppPackage("com.example.shop");
options.setAppActivity(".MainActivity");
AndroidDriver driver = new AndroidDriver(new
URL("http://127.0.0.1:4723"), options);
WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver,
Duration.ofSeconds(10));
try {
WebElement userField =
wait.until(ExpectedConditions.visibilityOfElementLocated(AppiumBy.id("input_username")));
userField.sendKeys("test_user");
driver.findElement(AppiumBy.id("input_password")).sendKeys("secret123");
driver.findElement(AppiumBy.id("btn_login")).click();
WebElement menuIcon =
wait.until(ExpectedConditions.elementToBeClickable(AppiumBy.accessibilityId("Menu")));
menuIcon.click();
String scrollObject = "new UiScrollable(new
UiSelector().scrollable(true))." +
"scrollIntoView(new
UiSelector().text(\"Wireless Headphones\"));";
driver.findElement(AppiumBy.androidUIAutomator(scrollObject));
String xpath =
"//android.widget.TextView[@text='Wireless
Headphones']/../android.widget.Button[@text='Add to Cart']";
driver.findElement(AppiumBy.xpath(xpath)).click();
} finally {
driver.quit();
}
}
}Maestro
appId: com.example.app
---
- launchApp
- tapOn: "Username"
- inputText: "test_user"
- tapOn: "Password"
- inputText: "secret123"
- tapOn: "Log In"
- tapOn: "Menu"
- scrollUntilVisible:
element:
text: "Wireless Headphones"
direction: DOWN
- tapOn: "Add to Cart"Less complexity
Maestro removes the work that makes UI suites brittle
Common mobile testing pain points are built into Maestro's default workflow instead of becoming custom framework code.
Built-in auto waiting
Forget WebDriverWait and explicit timeouts. Maestro automatically handles UI synchronization before interacting.
Semantic targeting
Stop hunting for XPaths and IDs. Maestro interacts with the screen using text and visual cues, like a real user.
One-line scrolling
Complex gestures like scroll-to-find become a single declarative command: scrollUntilVisible.
Case studies
In good companies
Join thousands of companies who have turned testing into traction.
Case study
Wahed Slashed Test Creation Time by 95%
By switching to Maestro, Wahed's team went from spending 3-4 hours per test to just 10-15 minutes.
Read the full study
Case study
Doccla Eliminated a Full Day of Manual Testing
Doccla replaced a full day of manual regression testing with a fully automated Maestro pipeline.
Read the full study
Case study
Komoot Built 100+ Tests in Just Two Weeks
Komoot was able to get up and running with a robust suite of over 100 tests in less than 2 weeks.
Install Maestro
Ready to test the Maestro way?
Write your first test in under 5 minutes with Maestro Studio or the CLI.